We have to rely on the subtitles being correct but can you imagine Archbishop Rowan Williams daring to say such things?
Neither can I, which is probably why the non-controversial coward has resigned and gone back to school.
I'm not sure I agree with the statements in the video entirely but fair play to the man for saying what he thinks. He will no doubt be roasted by the tolerant brigade for having an opinion that contradicts theirs.
Sunday, 18 March 2012
Saturday, 17 March 2012
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
RECORD EXPORTS AS FIRMS SHUN THE EU
THE economy has been given a major boost as figures showed exports hit record levels to countries outside the European Union.
Soaring trade to the US, Russia and China saw exports to non-EU countries rise to £12.9billion in January.
It was a leap of £500million from the previous month and the highest level since records began in 1998.
And while the trade deficit on goods and services – the gap between exports and imports – widened to £1.8billion in January from £1.2billion in December, the figure is still far below the average for 2011.
The rise in exports was fuelled by booming sales of Rolls-Royce and Jaguar cars to the three economic powerhouses and is a welcome pre-Budget boost to the Chancellor George Osborne’s plans to rebalance the economy.
It triggered fresh calls for Britain to leave the European Union altogether.
Tory MP Philip Davies said: “Future economic growth around the world is in non-EU markets.
“For our future prosperity Britain must trade in these areas and not be saddled with the protection racket that is the European Union.”
A new poll yesterday showed almost two thirds of Britons want a national referendum on the UK’s relationship with the EU.
The YouGov-Cambridge survey also revealed that 60 per cent of people want the UK to have “looser” ties with the European Union or leave altogether. The findings add further weight to the hugely popular Daily Express Crusade calling for Britain to quit the EU.
Mr Davies added: “It is about time politicians caught up with public opinion and hold a referendum.”
The figures were welcomed by Nida Ali, advisor to forecasters the Ernst & Young ITEM Club, who said: “The increase in exports to non-EU countries in January is encouraging and we hope to see this trend continue.
“We have repeatedly highlighted the need for UK exporters to move away from their traditional trading partners and tap into faster growing emerging nations and there are some encouraging signs that this is starting to happen. Exports to China are continuing to grow at annual rates of more than 20 per cent.”
As it has often been said, the great trading nations of the world are in no trading federation such as the EU. Japan, Singapore, Australia, the USA, China and now India are all competing against each other and against the beauracratic bungling European Union with great success. We need to compete just like we did in the past, without the straightjacket of Brussels strangling our enterprise.
Soaring trade to the US, Russia and China saw exports to non-EU countries rise to £12.9billion in January.
It was a leap of £500million from the previous month and the highest level since records began in 1998.
And while the trade deficit on goods and services – the gap between exports and imports – widened to £1.8billion in January from £1.2billion in December, the figure is still far below the average for 2011.
The rise in exports was fuelled by booming sales of Rolls-Royce and Jaguar cars to the three economic powerhouses and is a welcome pre-Budget boost to the Chancellor George Osborne’s plans to rebalance the economy.
It triggered fresh calls for Britain to leave the European Union altogether.
Tory MP Philip Davies said: “Future economic growth around the world is in non-EU markets.
“For our future prosperity Britain must trade in these areas and not be saddled with the protection racket that is the European Union.”
A new poll yesterday showed almost two thirds of Britons want a national referendum on the UK’s relationship with the EU.
The YouGov-Cambridge survey also revealed that 60 per cent of people want the UK to have “looser” ties with the European Union or leave altogether. The findings add further weight to the hugely popular Daily Express Crusade calling for Britain to quit the EU.
Mr Davies added: “It is about time politicians caught up with public opinion and hold a referendum.”
The figures were welcomed by Nida Ali, advisor to forecasters the Ernst & Young ITEM Club, who said: “The increase in exports to non-EU countries in January is encouraging and we hope to see this trend continue.
“We have repeatedly highlighted the need for UK exporters to move away from their traditional trading partners and tap into faster growing emerging nations and there are some encouraging signs that this is starting to happen. Exports to China are continuing to grow at annual rates of more than 20 per cent.”
As it has often been said, the great trading nations of the world are in no trading federation such as the EU. Japan, Singapore, Australia, the USA, China and now India are all competing against each other and against the beauracratic bungling European Union with great success. We need to compete just like we did in the past, without the straightjacket of Brussels strangling our enterprise.
Thursday, 8 March 2012
SEVEN TERROR SUSPECTS WIN SECRECY MOVE
Theresa May is trying to deport the suspects, who cannot be named, on national security grounds
Secretary Theresa May suffered a setback in her bid to deport seven Algerian terror suspects yesterday when the Supreme Court gave them a chance to appeal.
The men can now return to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission and fight to have a witness statement heard in secret. If Siac agrees to make the statement in their favour confidential, Government lawyers will not even be allowed to check it is true.
Mrs May is trying to deport the suspects, who cannot be named, on national security grounds. They went to the Supreme Court after Appeal Court judges rejected claims that they risked “inhuman treatment” if sent home.
Algerian ministers have pledged not to torture the men, but they claim to have a whistleblower who can prove they will be harmed.
They want their witness to give evidence in secret because if British officials try to check its truth they may unwittingly reveal his identity.
The answer is simple, don't let them in in the first place
Secretary Theresa May suffered a setback in her bid to deport seven Algerian terror suspects yesterday when the Supreme Court gave them a chance to appeal.
The men can now return to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission and fight to have a witness statement heard in secret. If Siac agrees to make the statement in their favour confidential, Government lawyers will not even be allowed to check it is true.
Mrs May is trying to deport the suspects, who cannot be named, on national security grounds. They went to the Supreme Court after Appeal Court judges rejected claims that they risked “inhuman treatment” if sent home.
Algerian ministers have pledged not to torture the men, but they claim to have a whistleblower who can prove they will be harmed.
They want their witness to give evidence in secret because if British officials try to check its truth they may unwittingly reveal his identity.
The answer is simple, don't let them in in the first place
Sunday, 4 March 2012
Cardinal attacks plans for Gay Marriage
Cardinal Keith O'Brien attacked plans to 'redefine marriage for the whole of society at the behest of a small minority'
David Cameron faces fresh pressure from church leaders over the Government's plans for gay marriage.
Cardinal Keith O'Brien, the leader of the Catholic Church in Scotland, claimed the proposals are "madness", it has been reported.
In an article for The Sunday Telegraph, he accuses the coalition of trying to "redefine reality".
The Prime Minister is a "passionate" advocate of the change, telling his party two years ago he supported gay marriage "because I am a Conservative".
Cardinal O'Brien wrote: "Since all the legal rights of marriage are already available to homosexual couples, it is clear that this proposal is not about rights, but rather is an attempt to redefine marriage for the whole of society at the behest of a small minority of activists.
"Same-sex marriage would eliminate entirely in law the basic idea of a mother and a father for every child. It would create a society which deliberately chooses to deprive a child of either a mother or a father.
"Other dangers exist. If marriage can be redefined so that it no longer means a man and a woman but two men or two women, why stop there? Why not allow three men or a woman and two men to constitute a marriage, if they pledge their fidelity to one another?"
Earlier this week the Home Office defended the plans after Tory MP Peter Bone called them "completely nuts".
A Home Office spokeswoman said the Government believed that "if a couple love each other" and want to commit to a life together they should "have the option of a civil marriage irrespective of their sexual orientation".
I expect he will be sent for diversity training shortly. The prime minister supports gay marriage because he wants votes and has no moral fibre.
David Cameron faces fresh pressure from church leaders over the Government's plans for gay marriage.
Cardinal Keith O'Brien, the leader of the Catholic Church in Scotland, claimed the proposals are "madness", it has been reported.
In an article for The Sunday Telegraph, he accuses the coalition of trying to "redefine reality".
The Prime Minister is a "passionate" advocate of the change, telling his party two years ago he supported gay marriage "because I am a Conservative".
Cardinal O'Brien wrote: "Since all the legal rights of marriage are already available to homosexual couples, it is clear that this proposal is not about rights, but rather is an attempt to redefine marriage for the whole of society at the behest of a small minority of activists.
"Same-sex marriage would eliminate entirely in law the basic idea of a mother and a father for every child. It would create a society which deliberately chooses to deprive a child of either a mother or a father.
"Other dangers exist. If marriage can be redefined so that it no longer means a man and a woman but two men or two women, why stop there? Why not allow three men or a woman and two men to constitute a marriage, if they pledge their fidelity to one another?"
Earlier this week the Home Office defended the plans after Tory MP Peter Bone called them "completely nuts".
A Home Office spokeswoman said the Government believed that "if a couple love each other" and want to commit to a life together they should "have the option of a civil marriage irrespective of their sexual orientation".
I expect he will be sent for diversity training shortly. The prime minister supports gay marriage because he wants votes and has no moral fibre.
Monday, 27 February 2012
Another White Victim For the Left To Rejoice Over
White Girls = Sexual Targets
“Hussain seems to have regarded girls, white girls, simply as sexual targets. He does not treat them as human beings at all. You got into that mindset yourself.”
That’s Lord Justice Davis handing enricher Ashtiaq Asghar, who killed 17 year old Laura Wilson, a life sentence with a minimum period of 17.5 years.
Ashtiaq had stabbed young Laura repeatedly in the head, and then thrown her into a canal to die whilst she was still alive.
The court was told that some of the injuries Laura sustained may have been as a result of Asghar using the knife to stop her from getting out of the canal.
Laura Wilson, aged 17 when she died, had been identified by Social Services as “being at risk of sexual exploitation by Pakistani men” when she was 12.
Despite this, all Social Services did was “carry out preventative work” – which sounds like slang for do nothing, let it continue, let’s not rock that racial harmony boat.
She became pregnant to married Muslim Ishaq Hussain, who was acquitted of involvement in her murder.
And, at just 17 she was dead, another victim on the road to enrichment.
We see it as a common factor, to borrow Justice Davis’ words – regard “white girls, simply as sexual targets. He does not treat them as human beings at all.”
Those kuffar never are – meat and an object, that’s the outlook of many enriching this land.
The white victims are, to borrow a term from history, considered as untermensch by the perpetrators.
Today we see another case ending in a long prison sentence, although he’ll be out before he’s 40 after a cushy stay with halal dinners no doubt – and another white girl dead.
How many more white girls will there be, perhaps not dead but with lives ruined?
You’ll never be told, it’s not a benefit of enrichment those in power would like us to know.
Hushed up, swept under the carpet, met with silence and denial – so many victims, deemed by officialdom a price that has to be paid and a nightmare that has to be kept quiet.
White girls as simply sexual targets – we’ll hear that a lot more in courts in years to come, and it’s just the tip of the iceberg. At least until they make it a hate crime to mention a white victim.
And, all the while, we’ll continue to say that there isn’t a problem, that enrichment is of universal benefit to our nation.
Where was the benefit to Laura and others like her, was she – are they – a price worth paying?
“Hussain seems to have regarded girls, white girls, simply as sexual targets. He does not treat them as human beings at all. You got into that mindset yourself.”
That’s Lord Justice Davis handing enricher Ashtiaq Asghar, who killed 17 year old Laura Wilson, a life sentence with a minimum period of 17.5 years.
Ashtiaq had stabbed young Laura repeatedly in the head, and then thrown her into a canal to die whilst she was still alive.
The court was told that some of the injuries Laura sustained may have been as a result of Asghar using the knife to stop her from getting out of the canal.
Laura Wilson, aged 17 when she died, had been identified by Social Services as “being at risk of sexual exploitation by Pakistani men” when she was 12.
Despite this, all Social Services did was “carry out preventative work” – which sounds like slang for do nothing, let it continue, let’s not rock that racial harmony boat.
She became pregnant to married Muslim Ishaq Hussain, who was acquitted of involvement in her murder.
And, at just 17 she was dead, another victim on the road to enrichment.
We see it as a common factor, to borrow Justice Davis’ words – regard “white girls, simply as sexual targets. He does not treat them as human beings at all.”
Those kuffar never are – meat and an object, that’s the outlook of many enriching this land.
The white victims are, to borrow a term from history, considered as untermensch by the perpetrators.
Today we see another case ending in a long prison sentence, although he’ll be out before he’s 40 after a cushy stay with halal dinners no doubt – and another white girl dead.
How many more white girls will there be, perhaps not dead but with lives ruined?
You’ll never be told, it’s not a benefit of enrichment those in power would like us to know.
Hushed up, swept under the carpet, met with silence and denial – so many victims, deemed by officialdom a price that has to be paid and a nightmare that has to be kept quiet.
White girls as simply sexual targets – we’ll hear that a lot more in courts in years to come, and it’s just the tip of the iceberg. At least until they make it a hate crime to mention a white victim.
And, all the while, we’ll continue to say that there isn’t a problem, that enrichment is of universal benefit to our nation.
Where was the benefit to Laura and others like her, was she – are they – a price worth paying?
FAMILIES WILL BE BETTER OFF OUT OF THE EU
THE average family would be much better off if we left the EU, according to a leading economist.
Professor Patrick Minford said living standards would rise as Britain enjoyed freedom from the "haven of regulation and state intervention" in Brussels. He suggested the UK will probably "detach itself to a large extent" from the EU over the coming decade.
But leaving altogether could mean cheaper food, clothing and other goods thanks to competition.
An economist at Cardiff Business School, Prof Minford said: "What the EU does is raise the prices of most things traded within Europe through protection given to its single market by trade arrangements.
"Cars, computers, clothes, machinery, food - all have their prices held up by the restrictions on imports from cheaper sources, often China, but also India, New Zealand and South Korea.
"Outside the EU the prices of what we buy would be the cheapest available in the world - our industries would sell their output on their capacity to meet world competition. We would all benefit from buying freely in the world market at world prices. Our living standards would rise."
He made his comments in the Julian Hodge Institute of Applied Macroeconomics quarterly review.
Critics argued it would be impossible to leave the EU without causing damage.
Labour peer Baroness Eluned Morgan of Ely said: "It is nonsense, because there is no doubt that we would lose jobs. Our relationship to the EU is fundamental to our economy."
whose economy is this nondescript nobody in a nonjob talking about? hers for a guess
Professor Patrick Minford said living standards would rise as Britain enjoyed freedom from the "haven of regulation and state intervention" in Brussels. He suggested the UK will probably "detach itself to a large extent" from the EU over the coming decade.
But leaving altogether could mean cheaper food, clothing and other goods thanks to competition.
An economist at Cardiff Business School, Prof Minford said: "What the EU does is raise the prices of most things traded within Europe through protection given to its single market by trade arrangements.
"Cars, computers, clothes, machinery, food - all have their prices held up by the restrictions on imports from cheaper sources, often China, but also India, New Zealand and South Korea.
"Outside the EU the prices of what we buy would be the cheapest available in the world - our industries would sell their output on their capacity to meet world competition. We would all benefit from buying freely in the world market at world prices. Our living standards would rise."
He made his comments in the Julian Hodge Institute of Applied Macroeconomics quarterly review.
Critics argued it would be impossible to leave the EU without causing damage.
Labour peer Baroness Eluned Morgan of Ely said: "It is nonsense, because there is no doubt that we would lose jobs. Our relationship to the EU is fundamental to our economy."
whose economy is this nondescript nobody in a nonjob talking about? hers for a guess
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
